Energize America: FESA not FISA!

Join us at Netroots Nation, next Friday, room 19, 9 am, for Energizing America: Setting an Agenda for Progress. This panel will range far and wide across our energy challenges and opportunities.

Part of the discussion: the Freshman Energy Smart Acceleration (FESA) Act.

FESA is a package of suggested programs that could provide a rallying point for the freshmen (and women) class of 2009, to join together for passage a set of legislative initiatives to help spark an Energy Smart renaissance across the United States.

A note before embarking: Let us be clear. While this is being worked and discussed with a number of campaigns, FESA remains a concept proposal and there are no candidates signed up to endorse it. And, it remains a draft set of ideas — open to and welcoming comments, suggestions, criticisms, ridicule, and maybe even some praise.

FESA Principles and Assumptions

The Freshmen Energy Smart Acceleration (FESA) Act is built around a core set of principles and assumptions.

  • The proposed programs should have wide-spread impact, preferably in all 50 states.
  • The programs should work with public-private, federal-state-local partnerships.
  • The programs should make financial sense for the nation, while improving our energy and environmental situations.
  • The ideas should improve capacity (broadly defined), creating the possibility for cascading impacts, to help spark change across the nation.
  • FESA should, as part of capacity building, provide paths to improve understanding of and education about energy issues throughout the United States.
  • The FESA is not intended as a comprehensive energy package, to supplant or undermine Acts already under consideration within Congress. They are complementary to concepts being proposed by campaigns and Acts being worked on within Congress.
  • The FESA Act elements should begin to show tangible results within two years
  • A single freshman member of either the House or Senate has limited ability to drive through a policy initiative. A group, committed to a set of actions, has a greater chance of seeing a clearly defined program enacted. And, with this in mind, the total package is limited to $3 billion per year.

The Freshmen Energy Smart Acceleration (FESA) Act of 2009

With those principles and assumptions in mind, the following are six proposed ideas to be combined into the FESA Act of 2009.

Energy Smart Communities Act

This would see the realization of a concept developed with the original Energize America 20-point plan of 2006 that was further developed and worked on with members of Congress in 2007.

The ESCA would require $1.1 billion in funding each year to spark energy efficiency and renewable energy projects in local government infrastructure. The Federal Government would provide a ten percent match to all bond efforts focused on energy efficiency and renewable energy. (Thus, $10 billion in bonds with $1 billion USG matching. Ten years to help spark $110 billion in local and state government investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy.) The additional funding would enable the Federal Government to provide State and Local Governments energy audit and program planning expertise support. In addition, the Federal government would provide support in structuring/writing/negotiating bond terms. The basic target: the energy savings would be greater than the costs of repaying the bond, thus leading to a financial savings for the local community. In addition, these efforts within local government buildings would help develop the capacity (from building inspectors to solar hot water installers to code writers) for local businesses and individual citizens to be able to pursue energy efficiency and renewable energy projects.

Green the Schools

This part of FESA would supplement the recently passed House 21st Century Green High-Performing Public School Facilities Act . The FESA Green the Schools Act would provide $500 million / year additionally to (1) $200 million to enable 100% of new school construction to meet Energy Star / LEED Silver standards (at a minimum); (2) $200 million to spark achievement of Energy Star + / LEED Gold or Platinum in additional school construction; $50 million a year to fund student data gathering and research in public schools on program impacts/efficiency as well as education in, for example, conducting energy audits. Finally, the act would provide $25 million per year in scholarship awards to students engaged in these efforts. And $25 million would be available for standards development, lessons identified, and for educating school boards, school administrators about greening efforts, the financial and other benefits from greening the schools. To be clear, greening school facilities is almost certainly the most cost effective way to improve student performance, with students (and teachers) doing better in healthier schools. And, the energy savings alone will pay for any extra capital costs to ‘green the school’.

Plug-In-Hybrid Electric School Buses

Plug-In Hybrid Electric School Buses (PHESBs) offer a range of benefits, from reduced diesel fuel costs to reducing youth exposure to diesel fume cancer (and other disease causing) pollution to providing mobile generators for emergencies or even local concerts. Right now, there is a purchase price hurdle that make PHESBs a poor financial decision for school systems facing tight budget environments. Establishing these on a large-scale, production line that enables learning and economies of scale would drive this differential down to the point where PHESBs would become the preferred option for most school systems. The FESA PHESB Act is intended to provide enough incentive to get PHESB production levels to that point.

The FESA PHESB Act would provide $60 million / year to spark the PHESB industry and to make PHESBs the standard for school systems. First year, $35 million for paying up to 50% of cost of PHESB for acquiring school district (40% year 2, 30% year 3, 20% year 4, 10% year 5); $10 million for paying up to 85% of PHESB cost for disadvantaged school districts (maintain this level); $5 million for PHESBs for military bases (for two years; after that for buying PHESBs for prison system and other requirements); $5 million for V2G (vehicle-to-grid) research and deployment assistance specifically focused on school buses. Note: No state to receive more than 20% of the funding per year; minimum of 20 states per year in funding. All 50 states to have PHESBs supported for purchase by year 5. By the end of the fifth year, if the average assistance is $50k, this program would foster introduction of over 4000 PHESBs and make PHESBs competitive with traditional diesel school buses for purchase decisions.

Energy Smart Education:

The FESA ESA Act would provide $75 million in funding ($500k per state; $100k per Congressional district) for “eco-efficient” drivers’ education; funding for energy education in public education programs; money for students to study/document energy impacts in their communities; with scholarship programs associated with this.

Energy Smart Rail

The FESA Energy Smart Rail (ESR) Act would seek to spark private industry to invest to transition the US rail system to all electric. $1 billion / year initiative to spark private investment in electrification of rail system. (This would make the Federal commitment in the range of 10% of the total cost. Note, for that, reduction of US oil demand by 500,000 or more barrels per day by 2020 … roughly 2.5% of US current demand.) $100 million/year in additional funding for research and development support for using the electrified rail system for a HVDC grid across the country. $50 million in funding for rail energy related research.

Energy Smart Mail Service

The FESA ESMS Act would provide $200 million for renewable energy / energy efficiency projects at US post offices throughout the country. ($200k for every Congressional District; $1 million for every state.) For post offices, with displays in the post office lobby. (Solar hot water, solar electric, small wind, geothermal heating/cooling, biomass, white roofs; etc …) $50 million for USPS EV/PHEV (and V2G).


There is a not minor issue at stake. In a “pay go” environment, where should FESA funding come from. For example, should the $100 million going to “abstinence only” sex education be used to fund the FESA Energy Smart Education Act? Should improved royalty collection on fossil fuel production from Federal land be used to pay for the entire FESA? Should FESA have explicit funding streams?

Questions / Reactions / Thoughts?

What is right here? What is wrong? Of course, there are missing elements … any glaring errors?

Are the principles and assumptions good ones? Is this the sort of thing that a coalition of candidates should sign up to, in your opinion?

And, as a reminder, the above is only the briefest of introduction to each of these ideas.



Ask yourself: Are you doing your part to ENERGIZE AMERICA?

Are you ready to do your part?

Your voice can … and will make a difference.

So … SPEAK UP … NOW!!!

And, join Jerome a Paris, Devilstower, Energy Smart candidates Debbie Cook (CA-45) and Mark Begich (AK-Senate), and myself for Energizing America: Setting an Agenda for Progress next Friday morning in Austin, Texas.


2 responses to “Energize America: FESA not FISA!

  1. This sounds good, but what are the odds of new school construction given what is happening in the housing market? It seems like funds flowing into refurb of existing schools would make more sense.

    Schools, at least the ones in Iowa, have lots of utility vehicles – snow pushers, SUVs serving as school buses, and so forth. Does the plug in bus section encourage the overall replacement of ICE vehicles with hybrids?

    The rail electrification move in any fashion excites me … but I’m curious as to Alan Drake’s view on this point.

  2. Couple things:

    1. Re Greening the Schools: Must make energy efficiency & renewable energy part of the process for school rehab/reconstruction. Now, building is still going on. It might stall or, as you suggest, stop, but the plans are still there.

    2. Very good point about the utility vehicles/fleet. The PHESB program is quite specifically targeted at one specific class of vehicles that uses about 2/3rds of a day’s US usage of oil per year. Replacing with PHEBs could cut this by more than half. The current school buses also have real health impacts on schools. This is meant to be a quite targeted effort, within a limited program. Your point about the fleet of vehicles could/should be part of a larger package.

    3. Rail electrification … this is budget-tight path to electrification, using the $1 billion as competitive tax incentive to prod rail industry to electrify. Now, if $10 billion/year were committed, as a national project, then this could both be extended and speeded up. Trying to stay within the funding limitation cap.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s