Global Warming did not cause the tornados! Did it?

First, let me express my sympathy for all those caught in the devastating path of tornadoes earlier this week.  To be caught in such devastating power of nature, recourse totally beyond one’s ability for action, is beyond my emotional imagination.  I can only begin to imagine the pain for the families of the 52 dead and for those whose lives were otherwise struck by these storms.  

Second, we should clearly understand, at this time, it is absolutely impossible to tie any single weather event, any specific ‘abnormal’ temperature, any storm to the effects of Global Warming.

Thus, it is impossible to state that “Global Warming caused the tornadoes” with any confidence.  Just as it is impossible to state that “Global Warming caused the California fires”, even if Global Warming did fan the flames (see also Forest Chief Warns of Global Warming threat), perhaps the correct statement is that Global Warming did not cause these tornadoes, even if Climate Change fostered the atmospheric stew that led to the tornadoes.

From Jeff Masters,

 Violent tornadoes rampaged across the South last night, killing at least 52 people, injuring hundreds, and destroying thousands of buildings. The death toll from the 2008 Super Tuesday Tornado Outbreak makes it the deadliest tornado outbreak in the past 23 years. The last time tornadoes killed so many people in the U.S. was on May 31, 1985, when 88 people died in a tornado outbreak that hit Ohio, New York, and Pennsylvania. What is really unusual about yesterday’s Super Tuesday Outbreak is that it occurred in early February. Only one other tornado outbreak in the past century killed so many people so early in the year–the great Warren, Arkansas tornado outbreak of January 3, 1949, which killed 60 people.

Tuesday’s was a devastating tornado outbreak. But this shows the problem of isolated data. Nearly 60 years ago, there was an outbreak that killed 60 people.  And, that was in a United States with less than half today’s population but also, we might presume, less adequate weather reporting and warning systems. How to rate death statistics?

Thus, is this unusual?

Tornado outbreak fueled by record warm temperatures
Yesterday’s outbreak was fueled by record warmth over the South. Record high temperatures were recorded in Little Rock, Arkansas (75), Shreveport, LA (78), El Dorado, AR (77), Memphis, TN (75), Jackson, MS (81), and Charleston, SC (79), to name a few locations. A strong cold front associated with a powerful winter storm over the north central U.S. pushed into this warm, unstable air mass, triggering Tuesday’s bout of violent weather.

“Record warm temperatures …” Now, that is starting to point more directly to a linkage with Global Warming, at least to make this tornado outbreak ‘consistent’ with the types of changes we might see in the globe due to Global Warming.

As highlighted by Chris Mooney,

when it comes to tornadoes, last year the definitive source of climate information, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, explicitly stated that there wasn’t enough proof to claim that they had been changing:

There is insufficient evidence to determine whether trends exist in the meridional overturning circulation (MOC) of the global ocean or in small-scale phenomena such as tornadoes, hail, lightning and dust-storms.

As Chris has also stated, a key challenge in this arena is inadequacy of the data to understand, fully, trend patterns.  That we can’t prove the linkage is true, but that absolutely does not mean that linkages are even close to being disproved.

If we look to NOAA,

“Tornado season in the United States generally starts in March and continues through the summer months but winter tornadoes have become an almost annual occurrence, according to Harold Brooks of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.”

Hmmm … Does that suggest that something is changing? And, what could be driving those changes?   Correlation does not mean causation, necessarily.

When asked about this, an acquaintance with far more education in this domain responded with a basic tutorial and comment.

Necessary conditions for tornadoes:

  • A deep layer of mid-atmospheric dry air above a moist surface layer
  • Steep moisture and temperature gradients
  • High surface temperatures
  • Low level convergence and upper level divergence
  • Vertical windshear (change in wind direction and speed with height)
  • Atmospheric instability (air continues to rise once it starts rising)

Global warming has increased surface temperatures  (“surface air temperatures over land have risen at about double the ocean rate after 1979 (more than 0.27°C per decade vs. 0.13°C per decade), with the greatest warming during winter (December to February) and spring (March to May) in the Northern Hemisphere”), increased atmospheric moisture content (“increases in temperature lead to increases in the moisture-holding capacity of the atmosphere at a rate of about 7% per °C”), wind shear (“Mid-latitude westerly winds have generally increased in
both hemispheres”).

Certainty, no, but something suspicious?  In another piece of correspondence, he added information and reflected on the implications:

We certainly don’t know precisely how they are being shaped but we are starting to have a clearer picture of what the regional climate regimes will be in a significantly warmer world.

He concluded with these points.

  • This is a climate disaster;
  • Freakishly warm weather was a precondition for this climate disaster;
  • It doesn’t help that much to be in a rich country when a climate disaster hits your town;
  • The Bush Administration has decimated emergency response mechanisms and planning and research;
  • Climate disasters are guaranteed to be on the rise due to global warming;
  • Freakishly warm weather is guaranteed to be on the rise due to global warming.

This logic seems clear to me. You? 

In any event,  let us return to the question of the tornadoes.

Reality is that Global Warming is changing the atmosphere, the oceans, having an impact on the land (although less, at this time, than humanity’s direct actions), and is changing the environment in which weather and weather events occur.  That Global Warming will have some form of influence on tornadoes seems clear, what that influence might be seems far less clear in the science.

Thus, we absolutely cannot say, with any justifiable basis that I am aware of, that Global Warming caused the devastating Super Tuesday tornado outbreak, but we can, it seems, question whether fostered the atmospheric stew that resulted in the outbreak.


4 responses to “Global Warming did not cause the tornados! Did it?

  1. The root cause of the environmental declines we are facing throughout the world is a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. Once one-fourth part of the earth is destroyed (Re.6:7-8) we will move forward to the next Seal events, followed by Trumpet events, followed by Plague events. The earth is on a downhill slid; it will not recover. The first four Trumpet events will destroy an additional one-third part (Re.8:7-12).

    Patricia (ndbpsa ©) Bible Prophecy on the Web

  2. Pingback: Deniers Descend to Outright Deceit « Energy Smart

  3. Stop reading the media.
    Look at facts.
    The # of tornadoes on average has dropped over the last 50 years. Period.

    The reason there is “more” damage? People are richer and own more. Therefore, there WILL be “more damage” caused even if the # of tornadoes remains the same.

  4. Ster,

    Thank you for stopping in. Please provide sourcing material for your assertion, which seems totally out of odds with scientific reporting.

    For example

    The total number of tornadoes reported in the United States reached a record high during the year 2004, surpassing the previous record by almost 300, according to officials at the NOAA Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Okla. The findings are based on a preliminary review of reports filed by NOAA National Weather Service forecast offices and compared to historical records dating back to 1950.

    If you are going to claim that the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration is wrong and totally full of it, then you should provide a bit more substantive evidence than your assertion.

    Of course, $ value of damage is not an easy clear measure … and is not one that I used suggested.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s